Tags
The Central government employees were earlier grouped in to four classes viz. Class I, Class II, Class III and Class IV. Sometimes the classification was as Group A, Group B, Group C and Group D. ICS/ IAS, IFS, IRS, ITS etc. all India services were in a higher rank starting from Class I/Group A.
After the VI Central Pay Commission, the Group D/ Class IV in Central Services is being eliminated by upgrading eligible officials to Group C/Class III and no further recruitment in class IV/Group D.
In Public Sectors like BSNL, MTNL etc. the classification is Group A, Group B (Executives) and Non-Executives (which comprises of the earlier Group C & D).
Thus the Group D & C are merged in to one, the non-executives, which is a correct decision. Now, the question arises: Whether there is any need for a division between the executives and non-executives.
The name non-executive itself is a negative one – it means one who is not an executive. But the fact is that they are employees/workers, who also execute work. In fact they are not non-executives, but executives only. There is full justification that the division of names in to executives and non-executives should go. This discrimination is part of the British oriented superiority cult which has been continued by the Government of India. It is just like the khaki uniform supplied to the Class IV earlier to show that they are inferior. Now in the PSUs, all the officials from the top to the bottom are wearing the same uniform. It is so in many corporate concerns.
In such a situation, is it necessary to continue the name of non-executives? It is time for the government, PSUs, Private sector etc.to drop the name non-executive and have a common name for all the workers/employees.
VAN Namboodiri's Blog 
Dear sir thanks for right decision of union if comes in a way
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 1:34 PM, VAN Namboodiris Blog wrote:
> vannamboodiri posted: “The Central government employees were earlier > grouped in to four classes viz. Class I, Class II, Class III and Class IV. > Sometimes the classification was as Group A, Group B, Group C and Group D. > ICS/ IAS, IFS, IRS, ITS etc. all India services were in a h” >
i strongly agree with u comrade. In most of the offices most of the officers treat non executives ( especially Sr.TOAs) as their slaves. Mental agony due to this is so painful. Am experiencing this type of behaviour from this ‘ shining executives’-SUNITHA
Whether executive or non-executive – all are employees of the company and all do their work. And every body has to respect each other. Nobody has the right to treat others as slaves. This is part of the bureaucratic mentality of certain persons, which has no place in a civilized society.
Thanks sir but the field staff is facing problem due to non availibility of store moreover i have given a application for transfer but no decision have taken by ssa dehradun the divisional secrty has also procced the case but no result yet pl do needful thanks
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 8:54 PM, VAN Namboodiris Blog wrote:
> vannamboodiri posted: “Forum leaders called on Shri Manoj Sinha, Hon’ble > Minister of State for Communications. The members of the Core Committee of > the Forum, viz., com. P. Abhimanyu, Convenor, com. Prahlad Rai, GS, > AIBSNLEA and com. K. Sebastin, GS, SNEA, called on Shri Man” >
Dear Comrade, ake up the issue of transfer with your divisional and Circle Secretaries. Generally, equipment are available, but in case it is not available take the matter with the union.