P and T Department was one of the institutions which provided a lot of employment to eligible youngsters for decades in Independent India. The number rose to about 10 lakhs during the 1970s.

P and T was bifurcated in to Postal Department and Telecom Department. Continuous improvement in technology reduced staff in Telecom. When corporatised, BSNL had a strength of about 3.5 lakhs. After 20 years and with VRS implemented in 2020 for about 80,000, present staff strength is below 70,000. Casual/Contract workers numbering about one lakh has been reduced to about 35,000 by retrenching them even without paying arrears of wages for more than one year.

The Revival Plan announced by the government is only partially implemented, with 4G service etc. still far away.

How the work can be done with such reduced staff? Outsourcing of many works has started, but that is no solution. Franchisees are interested more in providing private telecom services than that of BSNL.

Government has replied in the parliament that there is no proposal to privatise BSNL. Well and good. But why not allow it to function by providing 4 G Service and recruiting sufficient staff to man the services?

By retrenching 80,000 workers, BSNL has saved about Rs.7,000 crores per year. BSNL can not claim that it is still in loss. Why not pay salary of the hard working employees in time?

BSNL Management should discuss all these with the unions and fulfil the responsibility entrusted upon them. Government should give all support to revive BSNL, instead of their full fledged support to Reliance Jio.

65. PROBLEMS, ACHIEVEMENTS (3)

TELECOM FACTORY COMMITTEE

For About one century it was the P & T Workshops, later called Telecom Factories, which manufactured and supplied many equipments, including Trunk Boards to P and T Department. Total seven Telecom Factories situated at Calcutta (Alipore), Gopalpur, Kharagpur, Jabalpur, Richai, Bhilai and Bombay. After initiation of neo-liberalisation policy in 1990s, government  started purchasing from outside, starving these factories. There was a move to close Kharagpur Factory, on pressure from Tata, whose factory was nearby and who wanted space for expansion. BSNLEU met Communications Minister Shri Dayanidhi Maran on 13^th July 2004 along with Com. Basudeb Acharya M.P. and requested that instead of closing, mobile towers be manufactured from there. It was agreed and manufacture of towers started.

The V Central Pay Commission in 1996  recommended that either all the telecom factories should be closed  or they should be privatized. These telecom factories were all in important industrial areas and covering about 50 to 200 acres. Many industrial tycoons were eyeing these areas. Met Chairman of the Parliament Consulting Committee on Telecom, Com. Somanath Chatterjee, M.P. and appealed to ensure that these are not handed over or closed. This issue, when brought for discussion in the Consulting Committee, union presented a detailed report and requested for modernization instead of closure or privatization. DOT officers who gave evidence also supported. Committee recommended on the same lines and Telecom Factories continued to work.

Poor condition of  Telecom Factories and the need to modernize and manufacture important items for telecom services were brought as an item in the JCM Meeting held on 30^th July 2007 by Staff Side. It was also suggested that a Joint Committee of Staff Side and Official side visit theses factories and submit its report. Accordingly a committee consisting of Shri R.P.Nigam, DDG(TF) and V.A.N.Namboodiri, Secretary, Staff Side, was constituted and asked to visit all TFs and submit report.

All the TFs were inspected by the Committee during October – November 2007. First visit was to Jabalpur TF on 5^th October. General Manager of  TF along with staff and union leaders numbering more than hundred gave us a warm welcome at the TF gate. After a light breakfast, visited all units of the factory, one after another. The Civil Superintending Engineer was  present. Microwave Towers, Galvanization shed, Dispensary, Tiffin room, Canteen, Library, manufacturing units, surroundings – all places visited.

Employees are working under very risky condition. Safety equipments are almost nil and risk is too much, especially in the galvanization unit etc. Scraps worth crores of rupees are dumped in the compound. Trees have grown even on the road inside the walls of the compound and the entire area seems like a forest. Risky to go up the watch towers. Toilets very dirty. Canteen also. Food for workers has to be improved. Manufacture of tower etc. below target.

Discussed with Union Circle Secretary and other workers. They told the surprising news that for many years, no senior officer had come to the TF and they are happy that a senior officer and Union General Secretary have come to visit the Factory.

In Kharagpur Factory, Towers are manufactured. After manufacturing, they    have to be galvanized. There were towers galvanized by the TF as also galvanized by private companies. While the towers galvanized by TF were shining, the others were almost black since due process was lacking. Questioned why all towers should not be galvanized from TF itself and directed accordingly.

In another factory, we saw lengthy iron plates and rail pieces, which can be used, along with scrap materials. When asked about it, the officers could not answer. Useful materials were taken and put in the store.

Within two months the committee visited all the seven factories. Everywhere union leaders, officers and workers gave full co-operation and explained what is needed to modernize and improve the TFs. These visits were used to hold union meetings also with good participation of workers, even belonging to other unions, though their number was very less. Under the leadership of Com.Sisir Bhattacharjee, veteran leader of Factory Workers, they were well organized.

The Committee prepared a detailed report and submitted to the National Council and discussed. Even though only about ten percent of the recommendations were implemented,  that itself was sufficient to infuse a new wave of energy and activity  in the factories.

DOT-BSNL-BSNLEU COMMITTEE

On many issues of the BSNL and its workers, final decision is to be taken by DOT, as BSNL is a fully owned government company as also that it was formed from a government department. Full autonomy was never given to BSNL Management and approval of DOT was required in many issues. This was creating a lot of difficulties in settling  issues of the workers. This was brought to the notice of Shri A.Raja, Communications Minister,  for intervention and settlement. According to his direction, a Committee was formed on 30^th August 2007 to discuss such important issues for settlement.  The Committee called DOT-BSNL.BSNLEU Committee consisted of DDG (SR), DDG(SU), DDG(Estt), and DDG(TF) of Department of Telecom, DDG(SR) of BSNL and General Secretary of BSNLEU, V.A.N.Namboodiri. Meetings were held every week for about two months and a lot of contentious issues settled or entrusted to BSNL for decision. A few of those issues are mentioned below:

1. Delay in absorption of employees in BSNL from DOT, due to pending disciplinary proceedings. After discussion assured immediate action.
2. Demand of BSNLEU for bonus of Rs.10,000. BSNL is authorized to take decision.
3. BSNL is entrusted to take decision on the demand of ‘Prothhasan Batha’ to workers in naxal affected areas.
4. Deposit in Central Government Employees Insurance Scheme will be returned the employees.
5. Pension anomaly of those employees who rtired from October 2000 to June 2001 will be urgently examines.

Some other issues like the above were discussed and either settled or entrusted  with BSNL for  necessary action.

PERKS COMMITTEE

A Committee to discuss increase in the various perks including allowances, advances etc. were constituted and the following decisions were taken:

1. Transport Allowance will be increased.
2. Special Allowance of Rs. 100 will be paid to employees in unclassified cities.
3. Festival Advance increased from Rs. 1500 to 5000.
4. 250 granted as Food Allowance
5. House Advance amount will be increased to 100 times of the salary.
6. Retirement Grant will be increased from Rs. 1001 to Rs.2001.
7. Personal Loan up to Rs. One lakh will be granted from Nationalized banks to purchase cars, two-wheelers, Computer etc.

It was not easy to settle the demands mentioned above. Hard bargaining and  organizing agitations became necessary. Even to hold JCM meetings in time much pressure had to be put.  (to be continued).

64. PROBLEMS, ACHIEVEMENT (2)

WAGE REVISION IN BSNL

The settlement about conversion from CDA to IDA pay scales with effect from 1^st October 2000 and consequent benefits to the workers have already been mentioned earlier. The next wage revision in PSUs was due with effect from January 2007, both to those whose 5 year Revision was made in 2002 and 10 year revision in 1997.

As per recommendations of the II Pay Revision Committee (PRC), executives of central PSUs, including BSNL, were granted pay revision with 30% fitment. Wage revision of non-executives is on the basis of negotiation and settlement. BSNLEU, recognized union, demanded for early wage revision. Leaders of Central Public Sector Trade Unions (CPSTU) met Prime Minister and demanded early decision in all PSUs. It had its effect in BSNL. The negotiations on wage revision started.

BSNLEU called all non-executive unions in BSNL to discuss and decide the strategy and demands in the wage negotiation as was done earlier, but NFTE and FNTO were not willing to participate. They seemed to be more interested in failure of the negotiation, probably with the next Membership Verification in mind. They tried to create many hurdles in wage negotiation.

At this stage, management imposed a condition that union should accept VRS, if wage negotiation is to start. BSNLEU rejected the condition, organized demonstration and dharna in front of the corporate office. Met Communications Minister. Management was compelled to withdraw the pre-condition and start negotiations. 50% DA was merged with pay.

Central Executive Committee of the union held at Kochi formed a committee to study and prepare a memorandum on our demand on pay revision. The report prepared was discussed with our partner unions in the United Forum. The negotiating committee from union side included representatives from all unions in the United Forum, which were our alliance partners. Demand for pay revision in five years was not accepted by management. Management tried to delay negotiations stating that the company was in loss.

It was only after the unions affiliated to United Forum headed by BSNLEU, went on a two day successful strike on 19-20 May 2009 that serious discussion started. Another strike on 19-20 against   lethargic attitude and non-cooperation of management. 

NFTE and FNTO demanded the management that they were prepared to accept whatever Management was proposing. They submitted letters from hundreds of employees to that effect. It was intended to derail the discussion, but BSNLEU stood firm on the demands. After grueling and detailed discussion wage revision agreement was signed between the management and the recognized union.

Though agreement was signed on 15^th January 2010, BSNL did not approve it pointing out many objections. At last it was sent to DOT for approval on 10^th March 2010. Against further delay in DOT, General Secretaries of United Forum led by BSNLEU gave notice for indefinite hunger strike with effect from 12^th April. Discussions were held with Secretary DOT and Communications Minister. In the discussions held with Minister, he gave direction to management to issue the orders within 15 days. Accordingly orders on pay revision were issued on 7^th May 2010 by the BSNL Management.

What are the main achievements of the wage revision?

1. The lowest pay scales of Rs.4,000 – 5,800 was increased to Rs. 7,760 – 13,320. The highest pay scales increased from Rs. 8,570 – 12,245 to Rs. 16,370 – 30,630.
2. 30% fitment.
3. Annual increment 3% of the new pay scale.
4. Stagnation increment will be 3%. 3 Stagnation increment after every two years.
5. One additional increment @ 3% on promotion.
6. HRA and other allowances
7. A new scheme will be worked out for Bonus.
8. Pension as per Rule 37-A of CCS (Pension ) Rules 1972 from Central government.
9. Orders with effect from 01-01-2007.

Comrades P.Abhimanyu, P.Asoka Babu, R.Venkat Raman, V.Subburaman, Suresh Kumar and other comrades in the committee gave valuable contribution in the negotiation.

It was only through continuous struggles, including two successful strikes, that a beneficial agreement could be signed. The wage expense in the earlier year was about Rs.8,000 which rose to about Rs. 14,000 crores, despite the fact that many employees had retired. One of the best wage revision of telecom employees so far.  An increase of about 40% in the wage bill. Further, the workers got a good amount as arrears due w.e.f. 01-01-2007.

Telecom employees all over the country accepted the wage revision as a great victory. It was an appreciation of the strong and effective stand and struggles organized by BSNLEU.

Loans from PSU Banks

Since there was acute delay and much difficulty in getting various loans from BSNL, BSNLEU put the demand that arrangements be made with the PSU Banks for taking loans. A Joint Committee of Official side and Staff Side were constituted. Com.P.Abhimanyu was the staff member. Management proposal to include private banks was rejected by staff side. First discussions were held with Canara Bank and Corporation Bank. Agreement was reached for taking various loans for construction / purchase of house, car, two wheeler, Personal loan, loan for natural disaster etc.  

Change of Designation of cadres

There were about 70 cadres and separate designations for them when BSNL was formed. This was due to the unscientific and irregular way of naming designations to the new cadres formed due to the requirement of the developing services and technology. After detailed discussions the designations of many cadres were changed as demanded. However, it took some more years to change the designation of TTA to Junior Engineer.  (to be continued)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PROBLEMS, ACHIEVEMENTS (1)

As pointed out earlier, in all membership verifications from the Second Verification in 2004, BSNLEU won with good majority despite some of the allies, including FNTO left the alliance. There existed a lot of important problems without settlement for years along with the special problems arisen due to corporatization. Small issues could be discussed with officers and settled. But major issues are usually taken in the National Council of the Joint Consultative Machinery (JCM). There will be 14 representatives from the recognized union and almost that number of officers. Chairman was the Director (Human Resources Development), who is a Member of BSNL Board. The meeting is to be held every three months, but during the previous more than two years only six meetings were held.

As Cabinet Secretary is presiding in the National Council of JCM of Central Government Employees, CMD of BSNL should have been the Chairman of BSNL JCM.  This was raised in the first meeting itself by the newly constituted Staff Side. But management was not prepared to change the existing system which started two years back and was agreed to by the then staff side. This system created a lot of difficulties, since no concrete decision could be taken on many of the issues as the Chief Executive was not present. Management utilized this situation to delay decisions in JCM.

VRS decision scrapped

 The first meeting after the second verification (7^th meeting including the earlier meetings), was held on 25^th January 2005. After introduction, welcome etc., I raised the issue that the Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) approved by the last JCM meeting should be scrapped forthwith, since it is completely against interests of BSNL as well as workers. Management contended that it was agreed to by the earlier recognized union (NFTE). We told that BSNLEU is now the recognized union and we will oppose this anti-worker decision tooth and nail. Management was compelled to accept our demand and drop the VRS. A decision of the earlier JCM meeting.

Supply of HMT Watch to staff

Considering the growth of BSNL and increased profit due to introduction of mobile service and hard work of employees, staff side demanded that HMT Wrist Watches be supplied free to all the employees. Though opposed first, management agreed afterwards. A Committee of Management and Staff Side, represented by me, was constituted for the purpose. Management was interested in negotiation with private watch companies, but I strongly opposed and firmly asserted that it should be from HMT, another PPSU. HMT was in financial difficulty and it would be a help to it. The committee had hard bargaining with Directors of HMT and agreement was signed in August 2006. Accordingly golden plated good quality watches with BSNL logo was supplied to all. Management side wanted separate watches for Board Members, executives, non-executives etc. We strongly opposed the proposal and told that no discrimination on status or pay scales. Only two types of watches, one for men and other for women – nothing more than that. That was also agreed. Three lakh watches were supplied and HMT was benefitted. HMT Unions thanked BSNLEU for the deal.

Management might have learnt that when all employees got the gift, Secretary Staff Side, who raised the demand, could not get it since he was a retired employee. When went to meet Shri S.D.Saxena, Director (Finance) one day, he took two HMT watches, one gents and one ladies, from his table and offered the same to me  as gift. I thanked him for his generous offer, but stated that I cannot accept the same as I am not eligible as per the orders, being a retired person.

In the next All India Conference of BSNLEU, Com.C.K.Gundanna, Circle Secretary, Karnataka, presented me a same model of HMT watch purchased from HMT with receipt of the same. BSNL Director was present. When attending FNTO All India Conference, Shri K.Vallinayagam, GS FNTO, also presented me with a watch. Management representative was there also.

Management might have felt embarrassed. In the next meeting of the JCM National Council, Management presented HMT watch to all Staff Side members, including me. Thus they solved the problem.

Five Promotions in Service

Another demand raised was that all employees should get at least five promotions in service, after every six years. Some cadres were getting two promotions, some were getting one and many were not getting even a single promotion. Though demand of two promotions while in service was agreed to during DOT days after a lot of struggle  since 1978 to 1991 and also agreeing for reduction of staff etc. by the then the recognized unions NFTE and FNTO,   there were still many cadres who were deprived of the same like staff of Telecom Factory, Stores etc. The first promotion was after 16 years and second after 26. Though 10% of those who got second promotion had eligibility to get a third promotion, most did not get it due various reasons.

Management was completely opposed to the suggestion of further promotions. In the JCM Committee constituted on this demand, management representatives put all kind of obstacles. It was only after years of hard bargaining and more than one strike that four promotions were agreed. Even in the last moment obstacle was created. Secretary of the Committee, GM(SR) Shri Shakeel Ahamed, who was very much against BSNLEU and close to OPG, created various obstacles in the committee, not to come to any  agreement. Hence decision delayed for years. At last date was fixed for signing the agreement on 30^th October 2008.  All other members were present and signed, but he was absent and did not reach even after hours. The tactics was not to get  agreement signed before ensuing membership verification, to deny its  benefit to BSNLEU.

I discussed with other members of  Staff Side and went and sat in the room of Director (HR) Shri Gopal Das, stating that I will  continue to sit there till  agreement is got signed by GM(SR). Things moved fast. Shakeel Ahamed had already left for his home in U.P.  The signed copy of agreement was sent by fax  to him with directions to sign it and return by fax. Within two hours the signed copy was got back. Many employees later asked why there are fax markings in the agreement.

Even after agreement, hurdles were created and issue of orders  delayed. BSNLEU was compelled to meet Communications Minister Shri A.Raja. The same day, 23^rd March 2010, orders were issued. 

According to agreement and orders, all officials will get promotions after every eight years. Some concessions were there for  first promotion for those recruited in DOT. Though agreement was signed only on 30^th October 2008,  promotions were to be implemented with retrospective effect from October 2004. Eligible to officials retired up to 01-04-2008. No sanctioned posts required for these promotions. No test or examination. SC/ST officials will get relaxation in service. One increment along with promotion.  All those cadres which did not have any single promotion in service, also will get all four promotions. In the prevailing circumstances, it was a great achievement. There was a fifth promotion, but it took further years to settle the same.

LIC Group Insurance Scheme

BSNLEU demanded that Group Insurance Scheme should be implemented for employees. Negotiation started with LIC in which BSNLEU was a party. In getting the premium reduced including risk factor as also concluding the agreement with LIC,  assistance was received from Com. Venugopal, then General Secretary of AIIEA. This was the biggest Group Insurance Scheme in the world with more than 3 lakh employees involved.

Works Committee

As per demand of BSNLEU, Works Committees, with representatives from Management and Recognised Union were constituted at All India, Circle and Divisional levels to discuss about improvement of services, modernization and other such matters. Orders were issued on 9^th October 2007, after much persuasion. It helped  improvement of the services.

Guidelines for Transfers

Transfer was always  a tool for  management to harass  workers as also to favour some others. BSNLEU discussed the matter with  Management and got issued clear guidelines, so that transfers will be ordered without favour or malice. Though violated now and then by some officers, generally these instructions were implemented. (to be continued).

62. SECOND MEMBERSHIP VERIFICATION AND VICTORY

After getting recognition consequent to membership verification, NFTE, instead of trying to settle problems of the workers, were more interested in attacking BSNLEU, its leaders and workers. It tried to destabilize BSNLEU through many crooked ways. Eight Circle Secretaries of BSNLEU were got transferred with the connivance of management. Even ordinary members were got transferred to distant places. Pressurized management not to meet and discuss with BSNLEU leaders.

But it was not easy for management to ignore BSNLEU, which got majority in 7 circles and was the second biggest union with only slight difference in the votes with the first union. Union office-bearers made it a routine to meet the officers, give letters and discuss matters with them. Many issues were settled at all India level. But management will not reply letters and BSNLEU is not recognized. No seat in the JCM.

With determination to win in the next membership verification, preparations were started early. Discussed with S/Shri K.Vallinayagam and Thomas John, leaders of FNTO, which got 13% votes in the membership verification and was in the third position. They also were opposed to the agreements being made by the recognized union, bypassing the interests of the workers. Both the unions understood that NFTE had to be defeated, if the workers’ interests are to be safeguarded. Discussion took place and it was decided to form alliance for contesting in the second membership verification. The alliance was called United Forum with Vallinayagam as Chairman and VAN as Convener. Though names of FNTO and other alliance unions will be in the ballot paper, their members will vote for BSNLEU and seats in JCM will be shared.

Date of membership verification was notified on 26^th July, to be held on 1^st December 2004.  Four full months were there. This time was utilized to hold conventions and meetings in all the circles, jointly by the alliance unions, wherever they existed. Covered almost all the districts in the country during the period of these two membership verifications. Three or  four meetings in a day with the evening meeting in a big town /city with vide publicity and participation. BSNLEU office bearers and workers were in the forefront. Just like political parties, we had prepared our election manifesto with the important demands to be settled and exposed the wrong agreements made by the recognized union, NFPTE. One encouraging fact was that even members of other contesting unions, including that of NFTE, were there to hear us. After returning from the tours, we were sure that we will win this time with good majority.

Membership verification was held on 1^st   December 2004. Out of 2,83,919 non-executive employees, 2,62,988 voted. BSNLEU got 1,39,827 (53% of votes casted). An increase from 90,000 to 1,40,000 despite reduction of employees within the last two years. Great victory. NFTE got only 30%. The number shows that not only BSNLEU and its alliance, but also many NFTE members might have voted for BSNLEU. Our campaign had its effect.

After working without recognition for about 14 years since 1991, in DOT and BSNL, it was only with the hard work, sincerity and dedication of the thousands of active workers and leaders that BSNLEU got number one position and recognition. The alliance partners’ contribution was also there. All of them sincerely worked very hard to achieve the victory.

After getting recognition, BSNLEU ensured seats for all the alliance unions in the JCM. Though BSNL Management was reluctant to give seats to alliance partners, the strong stand taken by the union, settled the same. Alliance partners were happy since they got comparatively more seats than their votes. BSNLEU kept its words. FNTO President Thomas john became  the Leader and myself the Secretary of the JCM Staff Side. NFTE lost its recognized status. Many employees who were with NFTE only because of the recognized status shifted to BSNLEU, once it got recognition.

After verification, I put a suggestion to the GM (SR) to publish a book containing the orders etc. on verification and how it was conducted in BSNL. It was published along with introductions by both  OPG and myself.

It was at this time that the Railways decided to conduct membership verification through secret ballot.  Com.Chaubey, Secretary General, AIRF, visited my residence twice to enquire and find out how the verification was conducted. Gave him all the details and instructions issued. A copy of the book on verification published by BSNL was also handed over. He later told that it helped much in conducting verification. (to be continued)

 

 

 

 

 

 

MEMBERSHIP VERIFICATION

BSNL Management decided to conduct membership verification for non-executive unions to find out the majority union for grant of recognition.  Since formation of BSNL, recognition to the existing unions were cancelled and there was no recognized union.

Meeting was held with all the unions in the presence of the Chief Labour Commissioner (CLC), to discuss and decide modality of verification. One issue was whether verification should be conducted as per ‘Check off’ or ‘Secret Ballot’ system. NFTE suggested ‘check off’ system. BSNLEU demanded ‘secret ballot’ pointing out the manipulation, favouritism by officers  etc. in the earlier verification. CLC agreed and  decided that the membership verification will be by secret ballot only. All the newly registered unions applied for participation in the verification. They were given election symbols as suggested by them.

The union with maximum membership was NFTE. Although KG Bose group had majority in E.III Union, this was changed in the new set up with unions formed with all non-executive unions. The big majority for OPG group in E.IV Union turned the table in its favour. Considering this disadvantage, BSNLEU made election understanding with three comparatively small unions viz. Telecom Employees Progressive Union (TEPU), SC/ST Employees Association and BSNL Workers Rashtriya Union (WRU). The understanding was that the names of these unions will be in the ballot paper, but their members will vote for BSNLEU.

Leaders and workers of BSNLEU actively utilized the available time to tour,  hold meetings and meet the workers for getting maximum support and vote. Continuous tour programmes, day and night included. Effort to make a change  from an unrecognized union to a recognized union. As General Secretary, BSNLEU, toured almost all the states. All CHQ office-bearers were also on tours, attending many meetings.

General Manager (SR) Shri R.N.Prabhakar was the Chief Returning Officer. Since this was the first Membership Verification in BSNL, there were many doubts being raised now and then on which decisions were to be taken. We discussed these issues for taking the correct decision. My continued interactions were appreciated by the CRO.

Polling was on 25^th September 2002. About 3 lakh voters. 2250 polling stations. About 10,000 officials including Presiding Officers, Polling Officers etc. Ballot boxes from  Election Commission. About 750 Labour Officers as observers. Arrangements just like in a General Election.

Voting completed without any untoward incident. The counting to be made at District /Circle level and result to be announced on 28^th September at Kidwai Bhawan,  where offices of both MTNL and BSNL function. Representatives of Unions, BSNL Management and Chief Returning Officer present. When the counting in a circle is completed, the result will be intimated to CRO and the same will be exhibited in the big board prepared for the same so that all can watch and note down, if necessary.  The first results, mostly from small circles, were all in favour of BSNLEU. O.P.Gupta, who was sitting there along with others became worried and went away and sat in another room. He might have been afraid of another defeat, after Bhopal AIC.  BSNLEU was leading comfortably in votes till last, when results of only two –thee circles were to be received. But these were big circles like Maharashtra and Gujarat. In Maharashtra NFTE got 18,568 votes while BSNLEU received only 2854. This changed the balance. But results were not announced then and there, since there were cases in court, as also results from some circles were not very clear.

It was on 1^st October 2002, during the celebration of the second foundation day anniversary of BSNL, where BSNL Management / officers, union representatives etc were there, that  Chief Returning Officer with results arrived. NFTE was declared as the first union with 1,05,209 votes and BSNLEU second union with 89,486 votes. 35% and 30% of total votes.

Interesting fact was that, both  CRO as well as CMD and other officers congratulated BSNLEU, though it got only  second position . All of them had thought that NFTE will win with a very big difference. The advance of BSNLEU was taken note  by all.

BSNLEU got majority of votes in 9 circles as also more or less votes in all the 35 circles. NFTE, though got first position all over, got nil votes in two circles and 3 and 11 votes in two other circles. NFTE which claimed about 1,40,000 members got only 1,05,00 votes, whereas BSNLEU which had only  about 70,000 members got about 90,000 votes. All understood how where the tide was moving.

In DOT, two major Federations, NFTE and FNTO, were granted recognition and seats in JCM were shared by them. In the same way, the first two unions were to be granted recognition and seats allotted in the JCM. BSNL Management was also not against it. But NFTE strongly opposed grant of recognition to second union and threatened management that it will go to court if second union is granted recognition. Instead of taking  correct decision, BSNL Management did not grant recognition to BSNLEU.

NFTE had to pay a big price for its wrong approach. From the second verification onwards BSNLEU got first position and recognition. NFTE’s recognition was lost. It never got the first position afterwards and had to content without recognized status and without seat in JCM. It was only after BSNLEU took up the case for grant of recognition to the second union that NFTE got recognition after about 10 years.

60. BSNL IS BORN

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) was formed on 1^st October 2000, months before it was proposed to be, as agreement to that effect has already been reached with the three Federations.

The inauguration function was held near the gate in front of  Sanchar Bhawan, headquarters of Telecom Department. Communications Minister in Vajpayee Government, Shri Ram Vilas Paswan, inaugurated. DOT Officers, other prominent persons and union leaders were present. I was sitting in front of the audience, near the dais.

Immediately after the function was over, press reporters surrounded and started posing questions to me like ‘Why you, who have been strongly opposing corporatisation and have organised many strikes against it, are participating in this function?’ Minister was present there. Perhaps he might have remembered his address in the dharna organised by       E.III Union a few years back before Sanchar Bhawan, along with Com. Susheela Gopalan M.P. and other leaders.  My reply to the question was simple: ‘Even an illegitimate child when born, has got to be cared for.’ Minister as well as press reporters laughed.

In addition to ITI, MTNL and VSNL, one more PSU has been formed in telecom sector. A lot of problems were certainly to arise in connection with corporatisation of the telecom services, so far run by the government. A company will give priority to profit and loss more than efficiency of the services. Stiff competition will have to be faced from private operators.

Changes were inevitable in the service conditions of employees as also in union structure, resulting from shift to the public sector. Rules of recognition will be different. A lot of changes were going to come, for which neither government, BSNL management nor workers were not well prepared. Such was the haste with which BSNL was formed. Probably, the government wanted to form BSNL immediately after the agreement as they were not sure what will happen, if the same was delayed.

Formation of BSNL Employees Union

Consequent to formation of BSNL, recognition granted to the unions and federations were nullified. E.III (N) union had no recognition even before. Management stipulated that instead of the existing unions formed on the basis of government rules, new unions as per Trade Union Act should be formed and registered with Trade Union Registrar.

While separate unions for Officers, Class III and Class IV Employees existed earlier, now unions in the PSU will be for Executives and Non-executives. E.III (N) Union took initiative and consulted some of the class III and IV unions for formation of a Non-executive union.

Following unions agreed to form a joint non-executive union in BSNL: E.III(N) (General Secretary – V.A.N.Namboodiri), T.III ( GS – P.S.Raman Kutty), Telecom Administrative Union (GS- Pabithra Chakraborty), Civil Wing Employees Union (GS- S.Killivalavan), Telecom Factory Industrial Workers Union (GS – Sisir Bhattacharjee), Indian Telecom Employees Union (GS – V.Gopal), Circle Unions of E.IV Union in Kerala (CS – K.Raman), W.Bengal (CS – Dilip Das) and  Assam ( CS – J.N.Mishra). A Convention was decided to be held for this purpose.

Accordingly All India Convention was held at Visakhapatnam on 21-22 March 2001. Hundreds of workers participated from unions proposed to be merged in the new union.  In the presence of CITU All India President Com.E.Balanandan, NFPE General Secretary Com.K.Adinarayana, General Secretary AIIEA Com.N.M.Sundaram and other respected leaders, BSNL Employees Union (BSNLEU) was formed on 22^nd March 2001. It was significant that the date coincided with the death anniversary of the great working class leader Com.A.K.Gopalan, who was always the guide and well-wisher of  P and T unions. Office-bearers with J.N.Mishra as President and V.A.N.Namboodiri as General Secretary were elected with inclusion of leaders of all  unions. Comrades Sisir Bhattacharjee and Moni Bose were elected as Patrons. Thus BSNL Employees Union was born.

Workers enthusiastically welcomed formation of BSNLEU. Circle, District and Branch Unions were formed by holding  conventions of all merged unions at concerned level and electing office-bearers.

BSNL Employees Union was registered in Delhi on 15^th June 2001 with No. 4896 /2001. It was the first union in BSNL registered in Delhi. 

Pay Revision of employees

The First Central Pay Commission recommendations were implemented from 1946, Second from 1960, Third from 1974, Fourth from 1986 and Fifth from 1996. The next pay revision was expected from 2006. Calculation of DA is done on the basis of cost of living index.

In Public Sector DA is calculated on the basis of Industrial DA. In many PSUs, Pay Revision is done in five years, while in some others it is 10 years. Last Pay Revision was in 1997. Next, either in 2002 or 2007.

The question naturally arose. When the Pay Revision will take place and whether it should be on CDA or IDA pay scale? BSNL Management called all the unions to discuss the same. There was no recognised union or federation, since membership verification was not conducted in BSNL. All unions were treated as non-recognised and equal.

Before discussing with management, unions met and discussed.  O.P.Gupta suggested that the CDA scales can continue with a uniform additional Rs. 1,500 for all employees. This was part of the agreement made between the Federations and DOT while agreeing to corporatisation. This amount will not be calculated for any other purpose, including  for calculating allowances etc. It can be stopped at any moment.

Since, employees have been transferred to the PSU, IDA scales of PSUs which  are higher than the CDA scales should be demanded. was my suggestion as President of the meeting. All except OPG supported. Even Com. Jagan, Asst. General Secretary of  Vichare Union, suported stating that ‘though Guptaji is my leader, on this issue I am supporting Com.Namboodiri’s view’. At last, it was unanimously decided that we should demand IDA scales.

I was entrusted with the task of preparing the Memorandum including the pay scales, allowances etc. After going through agreements in various PSUs, including that of MTNL, memorandum was prepared, which after discussion and modification by the unions were presented to  management.

Detailed discussion took place with the management and agreement reached. Instead of the lowest scale of Rs. 2,550 it was agreed for Rs.4,000. Highest scale was fixed as Rs. 8570-12,245, instead of Rs. 6500- 10,500. Without another CPC or Pay Revision Committee, this increase was achieved. All the existing increments in lower scales were upgraded to higher increments of the new pay scales. This resulted in much increase in pay packet.

Workers were happy. Just like in any agreement, here also was an anomaly. Due to increase  in increment amount some of the senior officials, who have  just got promoted got less pay than their juniors who had many increments in the lower grade. This anomaly could not be removed, despite several attempts. Workers appreciated the important role taken by BSNLEU in the pay revision agreement. 

It was at this time that Communications State Minister Shri Tapan Sikdar called for a meeting of Welfare Committee. Management officers and all unions were present. Put certain demands including payment of pension and other benefits to the retired employees without delay. My suggestion was that all the employees retiring on superannuation should be given a reception by the top officer of the station. All payments including leave encashment, Gratuity, Provident Fund, salary of the last month etc as also pension orders, a brief case and shawl as also an appreciation letter should be given along with an amount of Rs.1,000 as a token of appreciation. Minister fully agreed with the suggestions adding that instead of Rs.1,000, Rs. 1001 would be given. Jokingly he added that Mr. Namboodiri, a south Indian, may not be aware of the importance of 101, 501, 1001 etc. in gifts. The gift was increased to Rs. 5,001 later. This assurance ensured that the retirees got all their claims settled at the time of retirement time itself. (to be continued).  

59. SUSTAINED STRUGGLES AGAINST CORPORATISATION

Government started initial preparations for corporatisation of DOT services as the first step towards privatisation. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL) was formed for providing telecom services in the major cities of Delhi and Mumbai. Since it was expected that better salary will be received, there was no opposition from the employees. Overseas Communications under DOT was converted to Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited (VSNL), another PSU.

Next step proposed by government was to form another telecom PSU for providing services in the entire country, except in Mumbai and Delhi, where MTNL was the service provider. Recognised Federations viz. NFTE and FNTO took a soft approach to this move on the basis that this was a policy decision of the government, which need not be opposed.

However, sensing the seriousness and genuine apprehension of the workers, E.III / E.III (N), T.III, Administrative Unions along with SNEA opposed the corporatisation move and organised agitational programmes. Since Bhopal AIC, such struggles were continuously decided and implemented.

Against the recommendations of the Athreya Committee to corporatize and privatise telecom services, one day strike was organised on 31^st December 1993 and got assurance from  government that the recommendations will not be implemented.

One day strike on 23^rd May 1994 was organised against the decision of the government to grant licence for providing mobile services to private companies as per National Telecom Policy – 1994. A series of agitational programmes were organised including Protest Demonstrations on 5^th July, submission of Memorandum to the Prime Minister and State Governors on 19^th July and Protest Dharna on 29^th July 1994.

A decision to go on Indefinite Strike taken from 17^th August 1994 was deferred by the three Federations on the plea that Communications Minister Shri Sukhram has given certain assurances. In fact, there was no concrete assurance. Hence, E.III and similar minded unions organised massive dharnas on the same day on which strike was to start.

A complete strike took place on 23^rd January 1995 jointly called by the three Federations  and Unions against the decision of the government allowing private companies to start pilot projects.

Unfortunately, the Federations withdrew from future struggles. In such a circumstance, E.III union took initiative in forming the Door Sanchar Sangharsh Samithi (National Action Committee) with about 10 unions including unions in Indian Telephone Industries (ITI) and continued the struggle against corporatisation. I was elected as  Convener of the joint front.

A National Convention was held at Mavlankar Hall, Delhi, participated by more than 2,000 delegates to discuss about the agitational programmes to be organised against corporatisation. Prominent personalities, Central trade union leaders, experts in telecom sector and Parliament Members including Justice Bhagavathi, Kumaramangalam M.P., A.B.Burdhan (AITUC), Neelotpal Basu M.P., former Secretaries of DOT, S.M.Aggarwal, D.K.Singhal and others addressed. After due discussions, decisions were taken for organising Protest Day on 5^th May 1995 wearing badges and organising dharna, formation of Sangharsh Samithi at lower levels, organise rallies and conventions and also submit a memorandum to the Prime Minister.

It was difficult for the recognised Federations not to ignore these developments and keep silent. Call was issued by the Federations and all unions including those in the Sangharsh Samithi for Indefinite Strike from 19^th June 1995. Three and half lakh employees in the crucial telecom department were going on strike. There was much enthusiasm amongst workers. Workers stood firm against the threat of government to impose ESMA as also arrests, dismissals and terminations. Central trade unions, political leaders and many M.P.s supported the decision to strike and demanded the government to concede the demands.

The strike started with full participation and was a big success. However, the Federations without consulting others negotiated with the government and withdrew from the strike without any important settlement. The same day, government granted licence to the private companies to run telecom services. It became clear that the Federations were not acting up to the expectations of the workers.

Since the Federations have withdrawn the strike, it was not possible to continue the same immediately, though workers wanted it. E.III (N) Union in consultation with other units of Sangharsh Samithi, filed a case in Supreme Court against formation of the corporation proposed by the government. Senior Advocate Smt. Kamini Jaiswal argued our case. Did not charge any fee.  Some NGOs also filed cases. On the other side,  vested interests had arranged a galaxy of top senior advocates. Our cases were dismissed by the Supreme Court.

Organised Sanchar Bhawan March on 26^th October and One Day Strike on 12^th November 1998 as per call of Door Sanchar Sangharsh Samithi against corporatisation.

Government announced National Telecom Policy – 1999 on 23^rd March 1999. Privatisation was the main aim. Provided more relaxations and facilities to private companies. Private companies were allowed to provide international telecom services as pressurised by World Trade Organisation (WTO). Against these anti-people measures a Seminar was organised in Mavlankar Hall, Delhi on 4-5 April 1999 which was addressed by prominent public men Shri Rabi Ray (former Speaker, Lok Sabha), Krishan Patnaik, Prabhat Patnaik, S.P.Shukla, Dr.Ashok Mitra, Prabir Purkayastha, S.M.Aggarwal, D.K.Sanghal, V.A.N.Namboodiri and others.

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) was constituted on 29^th December 1997, with the declared aim of openness and also regulating issues between the various telecom companies. But the real intention was to safeguard  interests of  private companies, as we will see later.

As per call of Sanchar Sangharsh Samithi or National Action Committee (NAC) as it was called, another one day strike was organised on 8^th June  and a two days strike on 24-25 August 2000. Workers massively participated in these strikes, as they knew what will happen if corporatisation takes place.

None of the three  Federations called for these strikes. They kept silent. The massive participation in these strikes, including that of their members made them anxious.  Federations were also compelled to go on agitation. They declared indefinite strike with effect from 6^th August 2000 against corporatisation. This was done even without consulting or intimating the unions which are part of the National Action Committee, while every strike organised by the NAC was informed and consulted well in advance with the Federations. I was away on tour and in train and got the information only on reaching Delhi in the morning of 8^th and after consultation, immediately called for strike.

Federations did not want us to join the strike since they had their own plan. As jokingly or seriously told by Guptaji to me later, our joining the strike would make it difficult for an agreement. They urgently sought for a meeting by the night of 8^th and came to an agreement with the government for corporatisation on assurance of government pension and regularisation of contract workers etc. The strike was withdrawn in the night itself. The Federations cheated the workers who were prepared to continue to struggle against corporatisation.

The door was open to the government for corporatisation of telecom services maintained by DOT. If the Federations had stood firm, it was difficult for the government to continue with corporatisation. As everybody knows, without the support of the 3.5 lakh workforce, converting such a technical department services to a corporation would have been almost impossible. (to be continued).

58. RETIRMENT FROM SERVICE

Retirement from service due on 30^th June 1966. Though correct date of birth is 24^th July 1938, as per official record it is 12^th June 1938, a mistake committed at time of giving date of birth at school.  Retirement age, 58 years.  Completed about 38 years of service.

Transfer to Lakshadweep, approaching court against it, cancellation of transfer orders, and no service and salary for 34 months – all mentioned earlier. Some developments took place afterwards. Shri U.V.Nayak, who was General Manager, Telecom, Kerala, during my transfer to Kavarathi joined as Member (Technical) in Telecom Commission. Shri B.R.Nair, who also worked in Kerala Circle joined as Member (Services). While discussing about reinstatement of a union leader dismissed from Jabalpur Telecom Factory, U.V.Nayak enquired about my loss of salary and dies-non during transfer period. When told that there has been no settlement, he asked why not an appeal to Member (Services)?

Prepared an appeal and submitted to Member (Services) through proper channel in which all facts including my functioning as Circle Secretary during the period, application for Foreign Service, its rejection, judgment of the High Court cancelling the transfer etc. were mentioned and requested cancellation of dies-non, regularisation of  Service and payment of salary. A very strict officer, B.R.Nair asked for detailed report from Kozhikode Office. Orders were issued granting Foreign Service and regularising service for the period, but no salary. (Foreign Service is a facility given to Union office-bearers to be deputed to the union for its work. Salary, pension contribution, leave salary etc. to be paid by the union for the period. This arrangement was agreed by the government to ensure that outsiders are not made office-bearers of the union).

After a few days when met B.R.Nair, he smiled and told that ‘your Kozhikode DM office  is ‘special’. He continued stating that when he wanted documents for proof of my functioning as Circle Secretary, the office had sent bundles of files with details my attending official union meetings, correspondence, agitations etc. When came to Kozhikode, enquired and found what has happened. Shri C.Padmanabhan, Deputy General Manager, who was a union leader earlier, had sent all these documents, in order to ensure that my application is favourably considered. Shri Padmanabhan was Branch President of Union, when I was  Branch Secretary. Shri M.P.Rajan Damodaran, another DGM was the Treasurer. Even after promoted to officer posts, both of them maintained good relations  with union and were much helpful. Incidently C.Padmanabhan was victimised for participation in 1960 strike.

Joined at Kozhikode Telephone Exchange one month back before retirement date, taking leave from the union. Got the chance to work with colleagues and comrades after a period of five years since my shift to Delhi. Same post of Chief Telephone Supervisor. My colleagues helped much in discharging my duties and I was free to certain extend to attend my union work.

Com.K.Kunhutty Master, a close friend and union activist, was also retiring on the same day. Send off party, taking of group photo etc. as usual. Many comrades spoke mentioning their remembrances etc. We both thanked all for the reception. Many comrades came to residence to bid farewell. I did not feel the pain and anxiety that are usual at time of retiring, probably due to full engagement in union activities.

A Reception was organised on 4^th July 1996 at Town Hall, Kozhikode at the initiative of the P and T Co-ordinating Committee. The hall was overflowing with leaders and workers of various service and trade unions. Com. O.Bharathan M.P., Chairman of Kerala Circle P and T Co-ordinating  Committee presided. Com.M.Dasan M.L.A., Chairman Reception Committee welcomed. Mayor of Kozhikode Smt. M.K.Premajam, Com. M.P.Veerendra Kumar, M.P., Com.Binoy Viswam (AITUC), Com.M.Vasu(CITU), Shri Sadiri Koya (INTUC), Com.K.Krishnan (FSETO), Com. K.Raman (Confederation), Com.M.Krishnan (Convener, NFPTE), Com. P.V. Chandrasekharan (CS E.III Union) and other leaders spoke. While speaking, Com.Veerendra Kumar mentioned that he had come directly from Kottakkal Ayurveda Hospital, where he was under treatment, as he could not miss the function considering his close association with me. Shri Sadiri Koya, a very senior INTUC leader stated that he learnt many things about how to function in a trade union from VAN. I knew very well that these comments were made due to their great affection for me.

Garlands were given by leaders of various organisations. I replied thanking all for the reception and presents.  Com.K.R.Sivadas, Convener, Co-ordinating Committee, proposed vote of thanks. Receptions were held at Ernakulum and a few other places.

Donated Rs. 33,000/- to CHQ E.III Union from the amount received as encashment of leave. I had no leave at credit actually. But the Account Officer in charge, as per existing rules, converted my half-pay leave in to full leave and hence allowed encashment.

Great loss – Mother passed away

Mother was staying with me at Kozhikode up to 1985, which was of great help. Her health was deteriorating and she wanted to go home at Perincherry.  Children of Pankajam’s sisters, Rajagopalan, Siva Prasad and Sathyanathan stayed with us now and then for their studies and work.  Also helped looking after the family.

Mother went home and stayed with family of my elder brother Sankaran Namboodiri. Due  to continued union activities, official duties and tours, I could not go home to meet mother as earlier. Used to go once in two or three months. After shifting to Delhi, visits became very rare.

Pankajam phoned me in the early morning of First November 1996 and informed the sad news that mother has passed away. With support of comrades in Delhi, booked the first flight to Kozhikode. Took loan of Rs. 5000 each from Comrades K.K.N.Kutty and O.P.Gupta. Kutty took me to airport in his car. Reached Mumbai at 11.30 hours, but connection flight to Karippur (Kozhikode) was only at 14.30 hours. Reached Kozhikode airport at 16.30 hours where Comrades K.Rajan and K.R.Sivadas were waiting. First went to Kozhikode residence, then along with Pankajam, daughter Mini and brother’s son Dinesh, to Perincherry. Reached home at about 20.00 hours. All family members reached, waiting for me. Many comrades and colleagues from Kozhikode and Kannur had also come.

Saw mother for the last time.  Lying calm and quiet. Difficult to believe that she was dead. Last rites and funeral completed by about 22.00 hours in the same place where father was laid to rest.  Dearest mother passed away, leaving all of us in grief and sadness.

Stayed along with brothers, sisters and other family members for about two weeks till all rituals were over. It was mother who looked all of us since father passed away, exactly thirty years back. Father died on 30^th October 1966 and mother on 1^st November 1996.

I was very sad that I could not be near her when she passed away. A lot of memories. The special love and affection being the youngest child. Hence the chance to drink mother’s milk till 4-5 years. When returning from school, she will be waiting with food. Sometimes even before taking bath, secretly giving tea and snacks. Stay at Calicut looking after our children. When family partition took place, putting her share with mine.  The sad feeling was there that I could not do my share of responsibility to her. Of course she never showed it. Mothers are mothers.

After all rituals, returned to Kozhikode and then to Delhi to union activities. (continued).

57. MARCHING AHEAD WITH COURAGE AND DETERMINATION

Stay and work at Delhi since November 1991 was a continuous struggle for existence and dedicated effort to advance the cause of workers and organisation. Not only at office and residence, but also wherever we were touring, problems were created by vested interests, including department and OPG group. As stated earlier, they could not accept the defeat in Bhopal AIC, after continuous dominance and leadership for about four decades since formation of NFPTE. Disrupted union by submitting parallel list of office-bearers. Membership verification was delayed and stayed through court cases. Utilising the closeness with the administration created all difficulties for the functioning of E.III / E.III(N) Union at all levels. It was a hard fight for existence.

Extreme climate of Delhi is well known. Intolerable heat in summer and intolerable cold in winter. No Air Conditioner, no heater in the residence as well as in office. Very often electricity failure, especially at night. Will go to verandah, sit in the coir cot, but no wind. Sometimes two or three hours. Had to take bath in severe cold water in winter, since no arrangement for hot water. Immediately after bath, dress and wear warm cloth. No money with union or self to purchase water-heater. It was after some years, that these essential facilities could be arranged.

In order to take up  issues of  workers and settle them to the expectation of  members, more man power in office was necessary. I was alone, after Moni Bose shifted to Calcutta. Organisational tours were important. Either Assistant General Secretaries or other office-bearers should be at  headquarters to assist. They will stay in General Secretary’s room.

Accordingly, in addition to the Assistant General Secretaries Comrades Debashish Dutta Gupta, P.Abhimanyu, P.Asoka Babu and P.Appaji, Comrades C.K.Narasimhan, M.P.Kunhanandan, S.R.Nayak, S.C.Bhattacharya, Mihir Dasgupta, G.L.Sheik, S.Chellappa, P.V.Chandrasekharan, S.Gopal, Badri Narayanan, G.Soman, Nikhil Sarkar, M.N.Reddy, K.R.R.Verma, P.Manickamoorthy, R.Muralidharan Nair  and many other comrades came to CHQ availing their own leave, spending money and worked. CHQ could be run effectively only due to their selfless services.

Continuous tours were taken during this period to streamline the organisation, form branch and district unions wherever it did not exist. Met leaders of OPG group and tried to  convince them to return to mother union. Went to homes of many comrades and had detailed discussion. There were many senior comrades who became inactive due to the wrong policy and undemocratic attitude of OPG. Many of them became active again. OPG group in collusion with administration created umpteen difficulties during such tours.

During a tour of Jabalpur, I was meeting workers in telephone exchange along with Com. S.R.Nayak , Circle secretary, M.P.Circle and enquiring about their problems. Heard shouting of slogans from outside “Namboodiri Go Back”. We came out and saw about twenty youngsters demonstrating and shouting slogans. I asked them what is the problem and who they are. They told that they are riksha drivers, belonging to AITUC and they are protesting against one Namboodiri who has come from Delhi, as per direction of their union. When I disclosed my identity, they withdrew from the scene.

Another incident in Patiala, Punjab. No members, no branch there for our union. Along with All India Vice-President Com. Gurcharan Singh, stood near the gate and started a small meeting with the employees who gathered, explaining problems of the workers. Com. M.L.Sharma, Circle Secretary of Punjab (OPG Group), who is a long-time friend of mine, came with a few comrades and sat there. After my speech, he asked many questions to confuse the employees. I answered one by one. When he went, all his followers did not leave. That day itself we could organise a branch there.

When went to Amritsar along with Comrades R.L.Moudgil, CS T.III Union, Gurcharan Singh and some other comrades, District Secretary of OPG group tried to stop us entering the exchange. I was determined to enter and he was forced to give in. Went to the trunk exchange where about 20 to 25 employees were on duty. Told them who I am and requested them to hear me for a few minutes. Spoke on the problems of the workers and organisation. They heard me with interest. Branch Secretary, OPG group, who was there thanked me and told that they all belong to OPG group and will continue so. The interesting thing was that when we visited after a few months, Com. Swaran Singh, our Secretary, told that good number of comrades have joined our branch.

Com.M.Sadanandan of Hubli was a very good leader and organiser, President of the P and T Cooperative Society, who was also connected with some trade unions in the PSUs stationed at Hubli. He had been inactive for some time due to the wrong policy and discrimination by OPG. Went to his house along with other comrades and requested to take active part in the union. He became Circle Secretary of E.III Union, then E.III(N) Union and BSNLEU when it was formed after corporatisation. His yeomen service is always remembered.

Even when most divisions in Rajasthan were with OPG group, Kota was strongly with us. Com.Swarankar, who was a well-known leader has been somewhat inactive for some time. Met him along with other comrades and discussed. He once again became active and gave guidance to our workers and strengthened the organisation.

U.P.Circle under veteran leadership of Circle Secretary Com.R.S.Yadav, was always with KG Bose group. But we did not have any branch union in the major city of Kanpur. Went there along with Com. Yadav and few others from Lucknow, held a meeting under a banyan tree and formed the first branch union. Within no time, other branches were formed and gradually we became the major force.

In the first verification of membership in E.III Union, our loss was mainly due to malpractices as also due to our meagre votes in Maharashtra, a major circle. This has got to be changed. Toured important cities including Mumbai. Met Shri Aravind Sawant, leader of MTNL Karmachari Sangh and Shivasena leader (later M.P. and Central Minister) in his office. We got a good reception. His support was assured. Within years, got majority in Maharashtra. After formation of BSNLEU, he attended AIC of BSNLEU at Mumbai and addressed on our invitation.

Likewise, attended most of the circles and met leading comrades.. Many veteran comrades gave their support.

CHQ was in acute shortage of funds. General Secretary was on loss of pay, since no leave at credit. Union not able to pay salary. The condition of the CHQ employees was worse. For three – four months, salary could not be paid. Printing charges of union journals for about one year was not paid to Gopal Printers. Fortunately, knowing the financial condition of the union, owner of the Press did not insist on immediate payment.

A few words about Shri Narayan Das Kapoor, owner of Gopal Printers. Aged more than 80 years. Will come to his office every day and attend work. When dispute was created by submitting parallel list, O.P.Gupta, former General Secretary, told Kapoor not to print Telecom and Correspondence for new General Secretary Moni Bose, but print for Vichare. Reply given by Kapoor was this : “ For forty years since 1954, I have printed journals for you, when you were the General Secretary. But now the General Secretary is Moni Bose. Though you and I have a long and close friendship, I cannot do a wrong thing. I will print the journals for Moni Bose, who is the GS.”

Funds had to be collected to meet immediate requirements. Quota received from branches was  very less, due to  dispute. The system of deduction of subscription of membership from salary and remitting to the union had not been introduced.

Decided to tour circles for fund collection in September 1996.  First, the southern states. A  convention was held at Kottayam, Kerala, with comrades present from all over the circle. Explained financial difficulties being faced by CHQ and requested for donations. An amount of Rs. 39,000 was received then and there with liberal contributions. Next day convention was at Perundurai near Erode in T.Nadu. Rs. 60,000 received as donation. Three casual labour comrades donated Rs. 2,000 each. Was reluctant to receive such big amount from casual labour, but they told that they have come with their families and it was their decision to donate to the union which is fighting for them. Leader of state government employees who was in the dais also donated a good amount.

Three meetings on third day in Andhra Pradesh circle – at Vishakhapatanam, Vijayanagaram and Sreekakulam. In the first two place got Rs. 10,000 each. Though our branch union was not started at Srikakulam,  meeting was held and some amount was received.

Retuned to Delhi and paid salary of the employees including arrears. Toured other circles and  got donations.

Remembering another instance.  Central Working Committee Meeting at Vadodara, Gujarat. Circle Secretary Com.A.C.Shah donated Rs.5,000 and District Secretary Com.R.T.Sharma donated Rs.25,000 as personal donations. There was good applause.

During this period, toured extensively from North Eastern circles to Gujarat and from Kerala to Kashmir, in trains, buses and motor bikes. Stayed in lodges, homes of our comrades, offices, Dharmasalas, Gurudwaras etc. Will mention about these tours later.

Whatever the hardships and difficulties, our comrades were determined to make all out efforts to strengthen the organisation and to settle the issues of workers. Thousands of comrades dedicated themselves for these activities. We were sure that these sacrifices will not go in vain and there was a better future. Thanks to all these valiant comrades! (TO BE CONTINUED)