State-run Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited’s (BSNL) decision to float voluntary retirement scheme (VRS) will render more than lakh employees jobless. The telecom company on 29 September accepted the VRS scheme, which was proposed by a committee headed by Sam Pitroda in 2008.
The company has sent the proposal to the Department of Telecommunication (DoT) for approval, said sources in the department.
The Pitroda committee report had stated that trimming the employee strength of BSNL would improve its productivity and help in cutting down expenditure.
{Unhappy with the board decision, BSNL employees have started to mount pressure on the management to recall the decision.
BSNL has 2,76,306 employees and the scheme will help the company save Rs 35,266 cr annually, said officials.
The VRS scheme will not affect the officers of Indian Telecom Service belonging to group A, M.K Chouhan, additional secretary, ITS Association told this newspaper.
Despite repeated attempts, there was no response from the top management of BSNL to our queries for confirming whether the said proposal was sent to the DoT.
Meanwhile, unhappy with the board decision, employees have started to mount pressure on the management to recall the decision.
V.A.N Namboodiri, convenor of the joint forum of executives and non-executives’ unions and associations, said that they are planning to call for a nation-wide strike on 15 November. “The top management of BSNL is on deputation from India Telecom Service and hence they do not have much stake in the future of BSNL and are not concerned about the employees working under them,” Namboodiri said.
He said that cutting jobs would not help the organisation. “Look at what happened to MTNL. The company had floated VRS schemes thrice for its employees. As a result, it started making losses. Retrenching employees is not the answer to the revival of BSNL, rather it’s just an ill-conceived design to benefit private players and shut down BSNL,” he said. Employee unions feel that comparing their strength with private telecom operators was not justified as they also installed landlines all over the country, something most private players did not.
Employee unions are also not impressed by the argument that PSU is spending about 46% of its income to pay salaries, compared to 6-10% in private telecom companies. “Earlier BSNL had about 4 lakh workers and the company had a revenue of Rs 40,000 cr and profit of Rs 6,000 cr to Rs 10,000 cr. There were more workers earlier and more revenue. By reducing the numbers of workers the revenue will also decrease,” said Namboodiri
They questioned committee’s recommendation to outsource work. “What kind of rationale is the government working on? On the one hand it decides to leave out 1 lakh employees who are already working in the organisation and on the other it talks about engaging people from outside,” asked Ratish Kumar, secretary of the Bihar chapter of Sanchar Nigam Executive Association.
BSNL sources admitted that the blame for the company’s sinking profits did not squarely lie with the employees.
As per an Ministry of Home Affairs directive, BSNL has been discouraged from purchasing telecom equipments from China, whereas the same equipments are being used by the private telecom companies.
The company has also not undertaken any major investment for maintenance of landlines and broadband in the recent past, which has led to a shrinking customer base.